New Search
Carl Sandburg Middle School
Carl Sandburg Middle School had
654 students enrolled in grades
PK 6 7 8. There were
1,720 in
Mundelein ESD 75 and
2,066,692 in all state public schools.
This school's Sun-Times rank is
320 among 1423 ranked middle schools.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, all public schools must have 100 percent
of tested students meet state standards in reading and math by 2014. In the interim,
states must set gradually increasing targets. This year in Illinois, a school is
deemed to be making Adequate Yearly Progress if it meets the following conditions:
-
At least 95 percent tested in reading and mathematics for every student group.
-
At least 85 percent of all tested students must meet or exceed state standards
on the reading and math tests.
-
A subgroup that falls below 85 percent can claim “safe harbor”
from failing adequate yearly progress if its percent of kids meeting or
exceeding state standards improves by 10 percent from the previous year.
-
High schools must have a graduation rate of at least 82 percent.
-
Elementary, junior high and middle schools must have an attendance rate of
at least 91 percent.
-
Click here for complete AYP guidelines.
This school has met all of the requirements for adequate yearly progress.
All State Tests: Composite Performance for All Grades
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| 2010-2011 |
90.3% |
89.5% |
76.5% |
| 2011-2012 |
90.0% |
88.7% |
76.7% |
ISAT Scores
State goals for the Illinois Standards Achievement Tests
were established with the help of state elementary teachers.
Academic warning refers to the percentage of students whose
work on ISAT tests shows an inconsistent command of the basic knowledge and
skills.
Overall Illinois Standards Achievement Test (ISAT) Performance
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| 2010-2011 |
90.3% |
89.6% |
82.0% |
| 2011-2012 |
90.0% |
88.8% |
82.1% |
Sixth Grade
Reading
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
| All Students |
64.2% |
24.9% |
89.1% |
64.2% |
24.9% |
89.1% |
56.5% |
25.2% |
81.7% |
| Boys |
65.6% |
18.9% |
84.5% |
65.6% |
18.9% |
84.5% |
55.3% |
23.1% |
78.4% |
| Girls |
62.7% |
31.3% |
94.0% |
62.7% |
31.3% |
94.0% |
57.8% |
27.3% |
85.1% |
% of students who are on academic warning
| |
School |
District |
State |
| All Students |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.2% |
| Boys |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.3% |
| Girls |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.1% |
Math
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
| All Students |
65.3% |
27.7% |
93.0% |
65.3% |
27.7% |
93.0% |
58.9% |
26.0% |
84.9% |
| Boys |
65.6% |
26.7% |
92.3% |
65.6% |
26.7% |
92.3% |
56.8% |
26.9% |
83.7% |
| Girls |
65.1% |
28.9% |
94.0% |
65.1% |
28.9% |
94.0% |
61.2% |
25.1% |
86.3% |
% of students who are on academic warning
| |
School |
District |
State |
| All Students |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.4% |
| Boys |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.5% |
| Girls |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.3% |
Seventh Grade
Reading
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
| All Students |
62.0% |
24.0% |
86.0% |
62.0% |
24.0% |
86.0% |
58.0% |
20.1% |
78.1% |
| Boys |
58.7% |
18.3% |
77.0% |
58.7% |
18.3% |
77.0% |
56.9% |
17.5% |
74.4% |
| Girls |
65.6% |
30.2% |
95.8% |
65.6% |
30.2% |
95.8% |
59.3% |
22.7% |
82.0% |
% of students who are on academic warning
| |
School |
District |
State |
| All Students |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.4% |
| Boys |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.6% |
| Girls |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.2% |
Math
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
| All Students |
53.0% |
38.0% |
91.0% |
53.0% |
38.0% |
91.0% |
53.5% |
31.1% |
84.6% |
| Boys |
50.0% |
36.5% |
86.5% |
50.0% |
36.5% |
86.5% |
51.6% |
31.0% |
82.6% |
| Girls |
56.3% |
39.6% |
95.9% |
56.3% |
39.6% |
95.9% |
55.6% |
31.1% |
86.7% |
% of students who are on academic warning
| |
School |
District |
State |
| All Students |
0.5% |
0.5% |
1.4% |
| Boys |
1.0% |
1.0% |
1.8% |
| Girls |
0.0% |
0.0% |
1.0% |
Science
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
| All Students |
62.0% |
25.5% |
87.5% |
62.0% |
25.5% |
87.5% |
54.6% |
25.3% |
79.9% |
| Boys |
52.9% |
27.9% |
80.8% |
52.9% |
27.9% |
80.8% |
51.3% |
26.9% |
78.2% |
| Girls |
71.9% |
22.9% |
94.8% |
71.9% |
22.9% |
94.8% |
58.1% |
23.5% |
81.6% |
% of students who are on academic warning
| |
School |
District |
State |
| All Students |
4.0% |
4.0% |
8.6% |
| Boys |
6.7% |
6.7% |
10.0% |
| Girls |
1.0% |
1.0% |
7.0% |
Eighth Grade
Reading
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
| All Students |
86.4% |
8.0% |
94.4% |
86.4% |
8.0% |
94.4% |
76.1% |
10.1% |
86.2% |
| Boys |
87.2% |
5.5% |
92.7% |
87.2% |
5.5% |
92.7% |
74.3% |
8.3% |
82.6% |
| Girls |
85.6% |
11.1% |
96.7% |
85.6% |
11.1% |
96.7% |
78.0% |
12.0% |
90.0% |
% of students who are on academic warning
| |
School |
District |
State |
| All Students |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.1% |
| Boys |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.2% |
| Girls |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.1% |
Math
% of students who meet or exceed state goals
| |
School |
District |
State |
| |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
Meets |
Exceeds |
Total |
| All Students |
56.0% |
33.5% |
89.5% |
56.0% |
33.5% |
89.5% |
52.4% |
32.6% |
85.0% |
| Boys |
59.1% |
30.9% |
90.0% |
59.1% |
30.9% |
90.0% |
50.1% |
32.7% |
82.8% |
| Girls |
52.2% |
36.7% |
88.9% |
52.2% |
36.7% |
88.9% |
54.7% |
32.5% |
87.2% |
% of students who are on academic warning
| |
School |
District |
State |
| All Students |
1.0% |
1.0% |
0.3% |
| Boys |
1.8% |
1.8% |
0.4% |
| Girls |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.2% |
Students
Mobility rate is based on the number of students who enroll
in or leave a school during the school year. Students may be counted more
than once.
Chronic truants were absent without valid cause for 18 or
more of the last 180 school days.
Racial/Ethnic Background
| |
School |
District |
State |
| Total Enrollment |
654 |
1,720 |
2,066,692 |
| White Enrollment |
44.3% |
45.4% |
51.0% |
| Black Enrollment |
1.8% |
1.6% |
18.0% |
| Hispanic Enrollment |
47.6% |
45.5% |
23.6% |
| Asian Enrollment |
4.6% |
5.3% |
4.2% |
| Native American Enrollment |
0.0% |
0.1% |
0.3% |
| Multi-Racial Enrollment |
1.7% |
2.2% |
2.8% |
Student Characteristics
| |
School |
District |
State |
| Attendance Rate |
96.3% |
96.0% |
94.4% |
| Limited-English Proficiency |
13.9% |
25.1% |
9.4% |
| Low Income |
29.8% |
30.1% |
49.0% |
| Mobility Rate |
3.2% |
5.2% |
13.1% |
| No. of Chronic Truants |
0 |
0 |
169385 |
| Chronic Truancy Rate |
0.0% |
0.0% |
8.6% |
| Dropout Rate |
% |
% |
% |
Average Class Size
| |
School |
District |
State |
| Sixth Grade |
19.1 |
19.1 |
22.4 |
| Seventh Grade |
21.8 |
21.8 |
21.3 |
| Eighth Grade |
20.9 |
20.9 |
21.5 |
District Teachers
Mundelein ESD 75 employed
115 of the state’s
127,830 teachers. Numbers are for the
entire district and are not available by individual school, except for the
percentage of teachers with emergency or provisional creditials and the
percentage of classes not taught by teachers deemed “highly
qualified.”
Racial/Ethnic Background
| |
District |
State |
| Total Teachers |
115 |
127,830 |
| Female Teachers |
82.2% |
76.9% |
| Male Teachers |
17.8% |
23.1% |
| White Teachers |
86.1% |
83.3% |
| Black Teachers |
0.0% |
7.1% |
| Hispanic Teachers |
13.0% |
5.3% |
| Asian Teachers |
0.9% |
1.3% |
| Native American Teachers |
0.0% |
0.2% |
Pupil-to-Teacher/Administrator Ratios
| |
District |
State |
| Pupil-Administrator Ratio |
215.0 |
205.0 |
| Pupil-Certified Staff Ratio |
11.6 |
13.7 |
Teacher Education/Experience
| |
District |
State |
| Average Teaching Experience (yrs.) |
12.2 |
12.9 |
| Teachers with B.A. |
48.3% |
37.8% |
| Teachers with M.A.+ |
51.7% |
61.7% |
Teacher Credentials/Parental Contact
| |
School |
District |
State |
| Teachers with Emergency or Provisional Credentials |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.6% |
| Classes Not Taught by “Highly Qualified” Teachers |
0.0% |
0.0% |
0.7% |
| Parental Contact |
98.0% |
99.3% |
95.3% |
Parental contact includes parent-teacher conferences, parental visits to school, school visits to home, telephone conversations, and written correspondence.
District Finances
Numbers are for the entire district and are not available by individual
school.
Due to the way Illinois school districts are configured, state averages
for equalized assessed valuation per pupil and total school tax rate per
$100 are not provided.
EAV (Equalized assessed valuation) includes all computed
property values upon which a district's local tax rate is calculated.
Total school tax rate is a district’s total tax
rate as it appears on local property tax bills.
Instructional expenditure per pupil includes the direct costs of teaching
pupils or the interaction between teachers and pupils.
Operating expenditure per pupil includes the gross operating cost of a
school district excluding summer school, adult education, bond principal
retired, and capital expenditures.
Financial Indicators
| |
District |
State |
Similar
Type |
Similar
Size |
| Average Teacher Salary |
$52,976 |
$66,614 |
$63,151 |
$60,221 |
| Average Administrator Salary |
$126,181 |
$110,870 |
$115,190 |
$116,247 |
| Instructional Exp. Per Pupil |
$5,083 |
$6,824 |
$6,534 |
$6,360 |
| Operating Exp. Per Pupil |
$10,056 |
$11,664 |
$11,190 |
$10,912 |
| 2009 EAV per Pupil |
$258,666 |
|
$348,788 |
$363,050 |
| 2009 School Tax Rate per $100 |
3.26 |
|
2.57 |
2.41 |
Fund Expenditures (2010-2011)
| |
District |
% of Dist.
Budget |
State Avg.
% of Budget |
| Education |
$13,865,835 |
73.5% |
73.7% |
| Operations & Mainenance |
$1,710,919 |
9.1% |
5.9% |
| Transportation |
$1,113,781 |
5.9% |
3.8% |
| Bond & Interest |
$1,357,955 |
7.2% |
7.4% |
| Municipal Retirement/Social Security |
$432,691 |
2.3% |
2.0% |
| Fire Prevention & Safety |
$0 |
0.0% |
0.8% |
| Site & Construction |
$392,653 |
2.1% |
5.1% |
| Total |
$18,873,834 |
|
Revenue by Source (2010-2011)
Numbers are for the entire district and are not available by individual
school.
| |
District |
District % |
State % |
| Local Property Taxes |
$14,051,494 |
69.3% |
58.2% |
| Other Local Funding |
$726,525 |
3.6% |
5.1% |
| General State Aid |
$2,012,879 |
9.9% |
17.1% |
| Other State Funding |
$1,913,903 |
9.4% |
9.5% |
| Federal Funding |
$1,585,180 |
7.8% |
10.1% |
| Total Revenues |
$20,289,981 |
|
Expenditure by Function 2010-2011 (Percentages)
Numbers are for the entire district and are not available by individual
school.
| |
District |
District % |
State % |
| Instruction |
$8,289,863 |
43.9% |
48.3% |
| General Administration |
$544,609 |
2.9% |
3.3% |
| Supporting Services |
$6,943,999 |
36.8% |
30.7% |
| Other Expenditures |
$3,095,363 |
16.4% |
17.7% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Guidelines
Under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, all public schools must
have 100 percent of their tested students meet state standards in
(making Adequate Yearly Progress in) reading and math by 2014. In the
interim, states must set gradually increasing targets to ensure that
goal will be met. This year in Illinois, a school is deemed to be
making adequate yearly progress if it meets all of the following
conditions:
-
At least 95% tested in reading and mathematics for every student group. If the current year participation rate is less than 95%, this condition may be met if the average of the current and preceding year rates is at least 95%, or if the average of the current and two preceding years is at least 95%. Only actual participation rates are printed. If the participation rate printed is less than 95% and yet this school makes AYP, it means that the 95% condition was met by averaging.
-
At least 85% meeting/exceeding standards in reading and mathematics for every group. For any group with less than 85% meeting/exceeding standards, a 95% confidence interval was applied. Subgroups may meet this condition through Safe Harbor provisions. ***
-
At least 91% attendance rate for non-high schools and at least 82% graduation rate for high schools.